Alfred Condominium v. Cheng Hsien Wu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alfred Condominium v. Cheng Hsien Wu

100 A.D.3d 472, 953 N.Y.S.2d 506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.3d 472 (Alfred Condominium v. Cheng Hsien Wu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfred Condominium v. Cheng Hsien Wu, 100 A.D.3d 472, 953 N.Y.S.2d 506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered October 28, 2011, which, in this action for, [473]*473inter alia, breach of condominium bylaws, granted plaintiffs motion for counsel fees to the extent of awarding fees in the amount of $50,086 (inclusive of disbursements), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no basis in the record to disturb the court’s determination of counsel fees (542 E. 14th St. LLC v Lee, 66 AD3d 18, 24 [1st Dept 2009]). After a hearing, the trial court determined that counsel fees in the amount of $50,086 were reasonable based on, among other things, the lack of any complex or extraordinary questions of law involved in the matter. Further, the trial court considered the relevant factors in determining reasonable attorney fees and its findings are supported by the record (1050 Tenants Corp. v Lapidus, 52 AD3d 248 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Tom, J.R, Andrias, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered October 28, 2011, which, in this action for, [473]*473inter alia, breach of condominium bylaws, granted plaintiffs motion for counsel fees to the extent of awarding fees in the amount of $50,086 (inclusive of disbursements), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no basis in the record to disturb the court’s determination of counsel fees (542 E. 14th St. LLC v Lee, 66 AD3d 18, 24 [1st Dept 2009]). After a hearing, the trial court determined that counsel fees in the amount of $50,086 were reasonable based on, among other things, the lack of any complex or extraordinary questions of law involved in the matter. Further, the trial court considered the relevant factors in determining reasonable attorney fees and its findings are supported by the record (1050 Tenants Corp. v Lapidus, 52 AD3d 248 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Tom, J.R, Andrias, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.3d 472, 953 N.Y.S.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-condominium-v-cheng-hsien-wu-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack