Alfred Avins v. City of Alexandria

Fourth Circuit

Alfred Avins v. City of Alexandria

23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18442, 1994 WL 191743

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1994

Docket94-1337

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 399 (Alfred Avins v. City of Alexandria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfred Avins v. City of Alexandria, 23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18442, 1994 WL 191743 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alfred AVINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1337.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1389-A)

Alfred Avins, appellant pro se.

Ignacio Britto Pessoa, City Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in this action challenging the denial on several grounds of a special use permit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Avins v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-93-1389-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alfred AVINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1337.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1389-A)

Alfred Avins, appellant pro se.

Ignacio Britto Pessoa, City Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in this action challenging the denial on several grounds of a special use permit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Avins v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-93-1389-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18442, 1994 WL 191743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-avins-v-city-of-alexandria-ca4-1994.