Alford v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Alford v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

225 So. 2d 740, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5837

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 7, 1969

DocketNo. 2749

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 So. 2d 740 (Alford v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alford v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 225 So. 2d 740, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5837 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

HOOD, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Raymond C. Alford instituted this action for the damages which they sustained as the result of a collision between an automobile owned by Jessie O. Sandel, Jr., in which Mrs. Alford was riding as a guest passenger, and a truck owned by Midwest Farms and being driven by an employee, Herman Procell. The suit was instituted against Procell and The Travelers Indemnity Company, the latter being the liability insurer of the owner of the truck. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

This is a companion to the suit entitled Jessie O. Sandel, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., 225 So.2d 736, which is being decided by us on this date. For the reasons which we assigned in that companion case, we conclude that there was no error in the judgment rendered by the trial court in the instant suit.

For the reasons herein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiffs-appellants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOOD, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Raymond C. Alford instituted this action for the damages which they sustained as the result of a collision between an automobile owned by Jessie O. Sandel, Jr., in which Mrs. Alford was riding as a guest passenger, and a truck owned by Midwest Farms and being driven by an employee, Herman Procell. The suit was instituted against Procell and The Travelers Indemnity Company, the latter being the liability insurer of the owner of the truck. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

This is a companion to the suit entitled Jessie O. Sandel, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., 225 So.2d 736, which is being decided by us on this date. For the reasons which we assigned in that companion case, we conclude that there was no error in the judgment rendered by the trial court in the instant suit.

For the reasons herein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiffs-appellants.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 So. 2d 740, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-travelers-indemnity-co-lactapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack