Alford v. State

108 S.E. 61, 151 Ga. 709, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1921
DocketNo. 2581
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 61 (Alford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alford v. State, 108 S.E. 61, 151 Ga. 709, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 369 (Ga. 1921).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for new trial complain of certain charges of the court as contained in the excerpts set out therein. All of these excerpts from the charge state correct principles of law as applicable to the facts of the ease; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial on these grounds. The charges complained of were also authorized by the evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Indictment for miirder. Before Judge Searcy. Pike superior court. March 30, 1921. John R. Cooper, W. O. Cooper Jr., and E. F. Dupree, for plaintiff in error. R. A. Denny, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and Graham, Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 61, 151 Ga. 709, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-state-ga-1921.