Alford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alford v. State

108 S.E. 61, 151 Ga. 709, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 369

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ga. 518 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1921·No. No. 2581·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for new trial complain of certain charges of the court as contained in the excerpts set out therein. All of these excerpts from the charge state correct principles of law as applicable to the facts of the ease; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial on these grounds. The charges complained of were also authorized by the evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Indictment for miirder. Before Judge Searcy. Pike superior court. March 30, 1921.

John R. Cooper, W. O. Cooper Jr., and E. F. Dupree, for plaintiff in error. R. A. Denny, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and Graham, Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for new trial complain of certain charges of the court as contained in the excerpts set out therein. All of these excerpts from the charge state correct principles of law as applicable to the facts of the ease; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial on these grounds. The charges complained of were also authorized by the evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Indictment for miirder. Before Judge Searcy. Pike superior court. March 30, 1921.

John R. Cooper, W. O. Cooper Jr., and E. F. Dupree, for plaintiff in error. R. A. Denny, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and Graham, Wright, contra.

Alford v. State, 108 S.E. 61, 151 Ga. 709, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 369 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

108 S.E. 61 (Alford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.