Alford v. State
This text of 25 Fla. 852 (Alford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was indicted in the Circuit Court of Suwannee county, Spring Term 1886, for unlawfully entering a building in the day time with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: petit larceny.
The defendant pleaded in bar of the action, that he had before that time been convicted before a justice of the peace for the same offence. The State demurred to the plea^, and [853]*853the court sustained the demurrer; the defendant was then put on trial, convicted, and sentenced to the penitentiary for one year and the case comes here upon writ of error.
No errors are assigned, and the only question to be considered is, whether or not the court below erred in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant’s plea.
The defendant was charged with a felony and the justice of the peace had no authority to try the case, and, such trial by the justice was no bar to a subsequent trial by the Circuit Court, and, therefore, the sustaining of the demurrer to the plea was not erroneous. Boswell vs. State, 20 Fla., 869.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Fla. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-state-fla-1889.