Alford v. State

125 So. 791, 23 Ala. App. 385, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 22
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 21, 1930·No. 4 Div. 551.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of possessing whisky and appeals.

The bill of exceptions is not signed and approved as is required by law. There is therefore no legal bill of exceptions.

The record appears regular and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alford v. State, 125 So. 791, 23 Ala. App. 385, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 22 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

125 So. 791 (Alford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.