Alford v. State

125 So. 791, 23 Ala. App. 385, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 22
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1930
Docket4 Div. 551.
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 791 (Alford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alford v. State, 125 So. 791, 23 Ala. App. 385, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 22 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of possessing whisky and appeals.

The bill of exceptions is not signed and approved as is required by law. There is therefore no legal bill of exceptions.

The record appears regular and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 791, 23 Ala. App. 385, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-state-alactapp-1930.