Alford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Alford v. State

111 So. 606, 21 Ala. App. 652, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 369

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 30, 1926

Docket4 Div. 241.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 So. 606 (Alford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alford v. State, 111 So. 606, 21 Ala. App. 652, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 369 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

There was a general verdict of guilty under an indictment containing counts charging distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and unlawfully being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited* liquors. On this appeal, prosecuted by the defendant from the judgment of conviction which followed, the bill of exceptions does not contain a recital that it contains all, or substantially all, of the evidence offered in the case. Any state of the evidence necessary will therefore be presumed, in order to uphold the rulings of the trial court as to evidence or charges requested. Terry v. State, 17 Ala. App. 527, 86 So. 127.

There being no error in the record, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

There was a general verdict of guilty under an indictment containing counts charging distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and unlawfully being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited* liquors. On this appeal, prosecuted by the defendant from the judgment of conviction which followed, the bill of exceptions does not contain a recital that it contains all, or substantially all, of the evidence offered in the case. Any state of the evidence necessary will therefore be presumed, in order to uphold the rulings of the trial court as to evidence or charges requested. Terry v. State, 17 Ala. App. 527, 86 So. 127.

There being no error in the record, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 606, 21 Ala. App. 652, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack