Alford v. Peers

Fourth Circuit

Alford v. Peers

428 F. App'x 257

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2011·No. No. 10-2246·Published

Opinion

[258]*258Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos A. Alford appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Peers, No. 7:09-cv-00170-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[258]*258Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos A. Alford appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Peers, No. 7:09-cv-00170-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Alford v. Peers, 428 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

428 F. App'x 257 (Alford v. Peers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.