Alford v. City of New York
This text of 494 N.E.2d 455 (Alford v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal by claimants Cronley, Wilhelm, Panzarino and Campbell dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that said claimants are not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (former CPLR 5601 [a] [iii]) and no appeal lies as of right by said claimants from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question. On the appeal by the remaining claimants-appellants, order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 420). We add that claimants have not set forth any special circumstances warranting deviation from the provisions of General Municipal Law § 50-h. There is nothing in the record to support claimants’ allegations that the scheduling of the required examinations pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h was purposely delayed by respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
494 N.E.2d 455, 67 N.Y.2d 1019, 503 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alford-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1986.