Alfonso v. School Board of Hills-Borough County

880 So. 2d 756, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7712, 2004 WL 1196087
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 2004·No. No. 2D04-135·Published

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

The narrow issue before this court is whether the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law in dismissing Joseph and Patricia Alfonso’s complaint for pure bill of discovery. We answer this question in the negative because a pure bill of discovery is not an [757] appropriate remedy in this case. See Trak Microwave Corp. v. Culley, 728 So.2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); JM Family Enters., Inc. v. Freeman, 758 So.2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Frazier, 696 So.2d 1369, 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We do not reach the issue of any duty the School Board might have to the Alfonsos under chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2003), to otherwise cooperate in investigating and prosecuting any potential claims against any third-party tortfeasors.

Petition denied.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alfonso v. School Board of Hills-Borough County, 880 So. 2d 756, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7712, 2004 WL 1196087 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

880 So. 2d 756 (Alfonso v. School Board of Hills-Borough County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trak Microwave Corp. v. Culley
728 So. 2d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Frazier
696 So. 2d 1369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Freeman
758 So. 2d 1175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)