Alfonso v. Orna Security
903 So. 2d 302, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8499, 2005 WL 1342464
Opinion
Without reaching the merits of the appeal referee’s disqualification of the appellant from unemployment compensation on the finding that he was discharged for misconduct, we must affirm the denial of benefits below because the appellant failed timely to appeal that ruling to the Agency for Workforce Innovation, Office of Appeals. See Maldonado v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 895 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Levert v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals, 868 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alfonso v. Orna Security, 903 So. 2d 302, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8499, 2005 WL 1342464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
903 So. 2d 302 (Alfonso v. Orna Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levert v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
868 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Maldonado v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
895 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)