Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Alfonso v. Orna Security

Alfonso v. Orna Security

903 So. 2d 302, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8499, 2005 WL 1342464
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 2005
DocketNo. 3D04-3289
StatusPublished

This text of 903 So. 2d 302 (Alfonso v. Orna Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfonso v. Orna Security, 903 So. 2d 302, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8499, 2005 WL 1342464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without reaching the merits of the appeal referee’s disqualification of the appellant from unemployment compensation on the finding that he was discharged for misconduct, we must affirm the denial of benefits below because the appellant failed timely to appeal that ruling to the Agency for Workforce Innovation, Office of Appeals. See Maldonado v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 895 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Levert v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals, 868 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levert v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
868 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Maldonado v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
895 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 So. 2d 302, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8499, 2005 WL 1342464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfonso-v-orna-security-fladistctapp-2005.