Alfonso Estrada v. the State of Texas
This text of Alfonso Estrada v. the State of Texas (Alfonso Estrada v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00119-CR
Alfonso ESTRADA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CR1837 Honorable Kristina Escalona, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 17, 2024
DISMISSED
Appellant Alfonso Estrada Jr. entered into a plea bargain with the State pursuant to which
he pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance. The trial court imposed
sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a
notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which includes the trial
court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement. See id. R. 25.2(d). We 04-24-00119-CR
must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
been made part of the record.” Id.
Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not
exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. R.
25.2(a)(2). The record also supports the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have a
right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of
appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).
On February 27, 2024, we issued an order notifying appellant that this appeal would be
dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended
certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record
by March 28, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July
2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant did not respond to our order, and
no amended certification has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(d).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alfonso Estrada v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfonso-estrada-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.