Alfonso C. Brito and the Unknown Heirs at Law of Maritza Brito, in Re: 3414 101st Street Lubbock, TX 79423 v. Bac Home Loans Services, LP Formerly Known as Countrywide Home Loans

Opinion

                                                            NO. 07-10-0480-CV

                                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                 AT AMARILLO

                                                                     PANEL C

                                                           FEBRUARY 17, 2011

                                            ______________________________

             ALFONSO C. BRITO and the Unknown Heirs at Law of MARITZA BRITO,

In Re:  3414 101st Street, Lubbock, TX 79423,

                                                                                                                        Appellants

V.

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICES, LP formerly known as COUNTRYWIDE

HOME LOANS,

                                                                                                Appellee

                      FROM THE 237th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

                                NO. 2009-548,621; HON. LES HATCH, PRESIDING

                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Alfonso C. Brito perfected this appeal on November 22, 2010.  The appellate record was due on or about January 7, 2011.  The district clerk filed a motion to extend the time to file the record on January 24, 2011, because appellant apparently failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for it, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(b)(3).  By letter dated January 26, 2011, we ordered appellant to certify to this court, by February 7, 2011, that he had complied with rule of procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2) and 35.3(b)(3).  So too was he informed that failure to meet that deadline would result in the dismissal of his appeal.  Appellant has failed to so certify.  Nor have we received any request to postpone the dismissal date.  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and the failure to comply with our January 26th order.

Per Curiam