Alfonso Anino v. United States
This text of 423 F.2d 698 (Alfonso Anino v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was named in three counts of a six count indictment charging violations of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a). Count four charged appellant with receipt, concealment and transportation of heroin. Count five charged him with the sale of heroin on the same day. Count six involved the same narcotic being transferred without appellant obtaining the written order required by § 4705(a). He was found guilty on all counts in a non-jury trial and sentenced to five years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.
Appellant’s constitutional challenges to the statutes under which he was convicted have been resolved against him in Minor v. United States, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283 (1969) and Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (January 20, 1970). All other issues raised by appellant have been discussed and decided against him in Chisum v. United States, 421 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 F.2d 698, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfonso-anino-v-united-states-ca9-1970.