Alfin Trading Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Alfin Trading Corp. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 446, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1955

United States Customs Court·Decided April 8, 1954·No. No. 57975; protests 217680-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Alfin Trading Corp. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 446, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1955 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 446 (Alfin Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related