Alfaro v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alfaro v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.

22 A.D.2d 788, 254 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2713

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 788 (Alfaro v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfaro v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co., 22 A.D.2d 788, 254 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with $50 costs to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept, in lieu of the award by verdict, the sum of $7,500, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to appellant. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive and that a verdict in excess of $7,500 is not warranted on the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with $50 costs to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept, in lieu of the award by verdict, the sum of $7,500, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to appellant. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive and that a verdict in excess of $7,500 is not warranted on the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 788, 254 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfaro-v-thomas-crimmins-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1964.