Alfaro (Albert) v. State
This text of Alfaro (Albert) v. State (Alfaro (Albert) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
, 260 P.3d 184, 188 (2011); (2) Alfaro's "gang-related tattoos and visible weapon supported the police officer's reasonable belief that [he] could be armed and pose a risk to officer safety," see Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968); Somee, 124 Nev. at 442, 187 13.3d at 158; see also Cortes, 127 Nev. at , 260 P.3d at 189 (holding that "the presence of a knife in plain view in a lawfully stopped car contributes to reasonable suspicion that other weapons may be present, making the person armed and dangerous even if the knife is moved out of reach"); and (3) the "protective pat-down to check for additional weapons was reasonable and justified under the factual circumstances surrounding [Alfaro's] stop," see NRS 171.1232(1). We agree and conclude that the district court did not err by denying Alfaro's motion to suppress. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Michael H. Schwarz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT CF NEVADA 2 (0) [947A saeo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alfaro (Albert) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfaro-albert-v-state-nev-2014.