Alexis Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2025
Docket1D2023-1275
StatusPublished

This text of Alexis Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida (Alexis Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexis Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2023-1275 _____________________________

ALEXIS TOUCHTON-WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.

February 5, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Alexis Touchton-Williams appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to grounds two, six, eight, ten, twelve, fourteen, and fifteen without further comment. As to all remaining grounds, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach the relevant portions of the record conclusively refuting these claims. The postconviction court erred in summarily denying these claims by failing to attach the relevant portions of the record to its order. While the trial court cited the record numerous times in its order, it listed no exhibits and failed to attach the portions of the record relevant to these claims. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (“On appeal from the denial of relief, unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief.”); Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253, 257 (Fla. 1999) (“To uphold the trial court’s summary denial of claims raised in a 3.850 motion, the claims must be either facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record.”).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ROWE, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peede v. State
748 So. 2d 253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alexis Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexis-touchton-williams-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.