Alexis A. Reyes v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 2021
DocketA21A0881
StatusPublished

This text of Alexis A. Reyes v. State (Alexis A. Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexis A. Reyes v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 03, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0881. ALEXIS A. REYES v. THE STATE.

In February 2015, a jury found Alexis Reyes guilty of armed robbery, false imprisonment, and impersonating an officer, and the trial court imposed a total sentence of 20 years in prison, to be followed by 10 years on probation. This Court affirmed Reyes’s judgment of conviction on direct appeal. See Reyes v. State, No. A19A1988 (Dec. 6, 2019). In October 2020, Reyes filed a pro se motion to vacate a void conviction and sentence, in which he challenged the sufficiency of his indictment as to the armed robbery charge. The trial court denied Reyes’s motion, and he filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Regardless of its nomenclature, Reyes’s October 2020 motion essentially seeks to vacate his judgment of conviction. See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 493-494 (1) & (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008) (a challenge to the validity of an indictment is a challenge to the ensuing conviction); Planet Ins. Co. v. Ferrell, 228 Ga. App. 264, 266 (491 SE2d 471) (1997) (“[P]leadings, motions and orders are to be construed according to their substance and function and not merely as to their nomenclature . . . .”). However, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a petition or motion must be dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2). Consequently, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/03/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Planet Insurance v. Ferrell
491 S.E.2d 471 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Jones v. State
659 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alexis A. Reyes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexis-a-reyes-v-state-gactapp-2021.