Alexiadis v. Fisher

232 A.D. 695

This text of 232 A.D. 695 (Alexiadis v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexiadis v. Fisher, 232 A.D. 695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Amended judgment, in so far as appealed from by plaintiff, affirmed, with costs to defendant Scheumann as against plaintiff. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that Scheumann assigned nothing to plaintiff and later was unable to arrange for a marketable title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexiadis-v-fisher-nyappdiv-1931.