Alexander v. Womble

25 A.D.3d 578, 806 N.Y.S.2d 876

This text of 25 A.D.3d 578 (Alexander v. Womble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Womble, 25 A.D.3d 578, 806 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated December 17, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 17, 2004, granting, without op[579]*579position, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to present a reasonable excuse for his failure to oppose the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate the court’s prior order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment without opposition (see CPLR 5015 [a]; Lizardo v Midwest Automation, Inc., 13 AD3d 418, 419 [2004]; Juarbe v City of New York, 303 AD2d 462 [2003]). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lizardo v. Midwest Automation, Inc.
13 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Juarbe v. City of New York
303 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.3d 578, 806 N.Y.S.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-womble-nyappdiv-2006.