Alexander v. Westchester Electric Railroad

242 A.D. 830

This text of 242 A.D. 830 (Alexander v. Westchester Electric Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Westchester Electric Railroad, 242 A.D. 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Westchester county in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of the operator of a trolley car in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger, and order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of inadequacy, reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is inadequate, unless within five days from service of a copy of the order herein respondent stipulate that the verdict be increased to $1,000 and that judgment, with costs, be entered thereon. If respondent so stipulate, the judgment so increased and the order are unanimously affirmed, with costs of the appeal to appellant. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-westchester-electric-railroad-nyappdiv-1934.