Alexander v. Wade

806 So. 2d 1228, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 328, 2001 WL 755664
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 6, 2001
Docket2980274
StatusPublished

This text of 806 So. 2d 1228 (Alexander v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Wade, 806 So. 2d 1228, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 328, 2001 WL 755664 (Ala. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Alexander, 806 So.2d 1222 (Ala.2001). In its opinion, the Supreme Court affirmed that portion of our judgment “affirmfing] the judgment of the trial court insofar as it voided the conveyance of Mrs. Wade’s interest in the property to Ray Alexander” and that portion of our judgment “revers[ing] the judgment of the trial court insofar as it voided the conveyance of J.L. Wade’s interest.” However, the Supreme Court reversed that portion of our judgment directing “the trial court to address the issue whether J.L. Wade’s conveyance should be declared void based upon the ground of failure of consideration.” In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, we remand the cause to the trial court for the entry of a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Alexander
806 So. 2d 1222 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
806 So. 2d 1228, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 328, 2001 WL 755664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-wade-alacivapp-2001.