Alexander v. TANTARO

306 S.W.3d 211, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 385, 2010 WL 1209049
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 30, 2010·No. WD 70975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Anna Tantaro appeals from the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court awarding damages, interest, and attorney’s fees to her ex-husband, Jerry Alexander. Alexander sued Tantaro under a breach of contract theory relating to the terms of the marital separation agreement the parties entered into prior to their divorce in May, 2000. On appeal, Tantaro raises three points. In her first point, Tantaro argues that the trial court erroneously applied Missouri law regarding the timing of equity valuations of real property that has been involved in a dissolution proceeding. Tantaro argues in her second point that the trial court erred in its award of attorney’s fees to Alexander. In Tantaro’s third point, she argues that the trial court erred in calculating the interest awarded to Alexander. We affirm in this per cu-riam order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. TANTARO, 306 S.W.3d 211, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 385, 2010 WL 1209049 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

306 S.W.3d 211 (Alexander v. TANTARO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winston v. State
306 S.W.3d 211 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)