Alexander v. State
This text of 580 S.W.2d 579 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
The conviction is for aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed at eight years.
The record contains no transcript of the evidence or statement of facts. Without any evidence, this Court cannot determine if errors in the charge constitute reversible error. It has been the rule that, absent a statement of facts, objections to the charge or exception to the trial court’s refusal to give requested charges will not be considered on appeal. Creech v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 563, 342 S.W.2d 757 (1961); Conwell v. State, 258 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Cr.App. 1953), and Moore v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 175 S.W.2d 76 (1943). See Texas Digest, Criminal Law, «=>1090(14), for many other cases to the same effect.
In the present case there is no objection to the charge. Nothing was raised on appeal and nothing is before us for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 S.W.2d 579, 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-texcrimapp-1978.