Alexander v. State
This text of 363 S.W.2d 267 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is the unlawful possession of amphetamine; the punishment, one year in jail.
The undisputed evidence, including the testimony of the appellant, shows that when arrested he had in his pocket an unlabeled vial in which were 5 or 6 tablets or pills.
Toxicologist Robert F. Crawford testified that he ran a chemical analysis on the contents of the vial which showed that each of the five grain tablets contained amphetamine.
The appellant testified that the pills or tablets were given to him by a truck driver, and that he so informed the arresting officer. He testified that he did.-not -examine them and did not know what they were or know that they contained amphetamine. The arresting officer testified that appellant told him he got the tablets from Dr. Thomas.
The jury resolved the issue against the appellant and the evidence'is sufficient to sustain the verdict.
No brief has been filed in appellánt’s behalf, and there are no bills 6f exception, and no exceptions relating to the court's charge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 S.W.2d 267, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-texcrimapp-1963.