Alexander v. State

113 S.W.2d 545, 133 Tex. Crim. 588, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 129
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 1938
DocketNo. 19349.
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.W.2d 545 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. State, 113 S.W.2d 545, 133 Tex. Crim. 588, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 129 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale, punishment being a fine of one hundred dollars.

We observe that while the complaint alleges that appellant possessed the whisky for the purpose of sale, the information omits the italicized words, charging only that he possessed whisky. No offense is charged in the information. Petit v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 336, 235 S. W., 579; Williams v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 455, 235 S. W., 1092.

The judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed under the present information.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U. S. Petit v. State
235 S.W. 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Williams v. State
235 S.W. 1092 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.W.2d 545, 133 Tex. Crim. 588, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.