Alexander v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Alexander v. State

1914 OK CR 179, 142 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 19, 1914

DocketNo. A-2092.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 179 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. State, 1914 OK CR 179, 142 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CTJEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Alexander, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of McIntosh county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in McIntosh county to another place therein, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of sixty days. Judgment was rendered on the 24th day of July, 1913. The appeal was filed in this court on the 23rd day of September, 1913. *670 No briefs have been filed by plaintiff in error and no appearanee made for oral argument. The Attorney General filed -a motion to affirm for failure to prosecute. The motion is sustained and the judgment is in all things affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CTJEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Alexander, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of McIntosh county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in McIntosh county to another place therein, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of sixty days. Judgment was rendered on the 24th day of July, 1913. The appeal was filed in this court on the 23rd day of September, 1913. *670 No briefs have been filed by plaintiff in error and no appearanee made for oral argument. The Attorney General filed -a motion to affirm for failure to prosecute. The motion is sustained and the judgment is in all things affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 179, 142 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.