Alexander v. State
376 S.W.3d 707, 2012 WL 3804466, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Darrell J. Alexander, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. State, 376 S.W.3d 707, 2012 WL 3804466, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
376 S.W.3d 707 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.