Alexander v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Alexander v. State

29 S.W.3d 398, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2000 WL 1528919

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 2000

DocketNo. ED 77804

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 S.W.3d 398 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. State, 29 S.W.3d 398, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2000 WL 1528919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant David Alexander appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court’s determination was not clearly erroneous. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant David Alexander appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court’s determination was not clearly erroneous. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 S.W.3d 398, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2000 WL 1528919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-moctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack