Alexander v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alexander v. State

116 S.E. 551, 30 Ga. App. 29, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 226

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 6, 1923

Docket14138

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 551 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. State, 116 S.E. 551, 30 Ga. App. 29, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for and convicted df the offense of larceny. The sole assignment of error is upon the [30]*30ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There is evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. This court is therefore bound to hold that it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for and convicted df the offense of larceny. The sole assignment of error is upon the [30]*30ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There is evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. This court is therefore bound to hold that it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 551, 30 Ga. App. 29, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-gactapp-1923.