Alexander v. State

31 S.E. 754, 105 Ga. 834, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 733
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 18, 1898·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

Where there is an assignment of error that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence, and the brief of evidence contains --no Pro°f whatever of the venue, a new trial will be granted. Carter v. State, 48 Ga. 43; Cloud v. State, 73 Ga. 126; Davis v. State, 82 Ga. 205.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Simmons, C. J., and Lumpkin, P. J., absent. Accusation of selling liquor. Before Judge Hammond. City court of Griffin. September term, 1898. J. Chestney Smith, for plaintiff in error. Joseph D. Boyd, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 31 S.E. 754, 105 Ga. 834, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 733 (Ga. 1898).

31 S.E. 754 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harmon v. Harmon
74 S.E.2d 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Simpson v. Mayor of Macon
69 S.E. 1084 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Mill v. State
57 S.E. 969 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Kolman v. State
52 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)