Alexander v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alexander v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 2017·No. 15-2314 & 15-2140·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 15, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D15-2314 & 3D15-2140 Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-32AP & 14-244AP ________________

Todd Alexander, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, William R. Ptomey, Jr., Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, C.J. and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J. In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Todd Alexander challenges both (i)

his conviction for animal cruelty, and (ii) the trial court’s revocation of his

probation based on the animal cruelty conviction. Because the jury’s verdict is

supported by competent, substantial evidence of when Alexander committed the

crime, we affirm. Gonzalez v. State, 841 So. 2d 650, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (jury

verdict supported by competent, substantial evidence must be sustained on appeal).

We remand only to allow the trial court to enter a correct written order, consistent

with its oral pronouncement, to reflect that the crime was not committed using a

weapon.

Affirmed; remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Alexander v. State (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. State
841 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)