Alexander v. State

32 So. 3d 716, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5102, 2010 WL 1329828
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2010·No. 4D10-932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*717 PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. Appellate counsel is not deficient for failing to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal. Suarez v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 190, 193 (Fla.1988); Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.2d 1377, 1384 (Fla.1987). With extremely limited exceptions, the appropriate place to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, not on direct appeal. “Appellate counsel cannot be faulted for preserving the more effective remedy and eschewing the less effective.” Blanco, 507 So.2d at 1384.

STEVENSON, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 32 So. 3d 716, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5102, 2010 WL 1329828 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

32 So. 3d 716 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jean v. State
41 So. 3d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)