Alexander v. State
680 So. 2d 635, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10932, 1996 WL 590792
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1996·No. No. 95-4388·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm defendant’s convictions for armed robbery and dealing in stolen property, but remand the latter for resentencing. The sentencing scoresheet erroneously listed defendant’s armed robbery conviction, for which he was sentenced as a habitual offender, as the primary offense. See Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. State, 680 So. 2d 635, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10932, 1996 WL 590792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
680 So. 2d 635 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheffield v. State
214 So. 3d 763 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Hunter v. State
732 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)