Alexander v. State

404 So. 2d 173, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21182
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1981·No. No. YY-443·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The provision in appellant’s sentence that he be confined “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, is surplusage, and as such is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So.2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed.

The appeal from the conviction for grand theft is dismissed without prejudice to appellant to file a motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. See Wilson v. State, 378 So.2d 1258, 1260 (Fla.1st DCA 1979), rev’d on other grounds, 395 So.2d 520 (Fla.1981); Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Hall v. State, 397 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 404 So. 2d 173, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21182 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

404 So. 2d 173 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gandy v. State
560 So. 2d 1363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)