Alexander v. State

284 So. 2d 478, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alexander v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 288 So. 2d 538
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1973·No. No. 73-117·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On appeal from an adjudication of delinquency for assault with a dangerous weapon [Fla.Stat. § 784.04, F.S.A], we have considered carefully the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and are of the belief that there does not appear of record competent substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial judge. The appellant testified that the shooting was an accident. There was no contradictory testimony. In addition, both the victim and his father testified that immediately after the shooting, the appellant stated to them it was an accident. Thus, it is apparent that the requisite element of intent was lacking. Gos-wick v. State, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 817 and Bass v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 25.

Accordingly, we must reverse the order adjudicating appellant a delinquent.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 284 So. 2d 478, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

284 So. 2d 478 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goswick v. State
143 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Bass v. State
232 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)