Alexander v. State
This text of 149 So. 2d 467 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from denial of habeas corpus to resist extradition.
The Attorney General’s motion to dismiss because of the appellant’s failure to file a brief, relying upon Phalen v. Fort, 266 Ala. 213, 95 So.2d 401, is hereby denied.
We consider Woods v. State, 264 Ala. 315, 87 So.2d 633, not to have been overruled by the Phalen case, supra.
We have reviewed the record and consider that the decision of this court in Chavers v. State, App., 143 So.2d 187,1 is controlling authority. Accordingly, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County is hereby
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 So. 2d 467, 41 Ala. App. 684, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 303, 1963 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-alactapp-1963.