Alexander v. State

132 So. 64, 24 Ala. App. 156, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 306
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 25, 1930
Docket1 Div. 933.
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 64 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. State, 132 So. 64, 24 Ala. App. 156, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 306 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of what is commonly called the “Five Gallon Law” (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 704).

The appeal is on the record proper without bill of exceptions.

The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Wilkerson v. State, 23 Ala. App. 520, 128 So. 777; Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774; Id., 221 Ala. 389, 128 So. 776.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, it is now too well known to require the citation of authority that, ordinarily, this court will not consider the giving or refusal of written charges. The refused charges appearing in the record will not be considered.

We find no prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkerson v. State
128 So. 777 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Hayes v. State
128 So. 776 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Hayes v. State
128 So. 774 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 64, 24 Ala. App. 156, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-alactapp-1930.