Alexander v. State

132 So. 64, 24 Ala. App. 156, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 306
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1930·No. 1 Div. 933.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of what is commonly called the “Five Gallon Law” (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 704).

The appeal is on the record proper without bill of exceptions.

The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Wilkerson v. State, 23 Ala. App. 520, 128 So. 777; Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774; Id., 221 Ala. 389, 128 So. 776.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, it is now too well known to require the citation of authority that, ordinarily, this court will not consider the giving or refusal of written charges. The refused charges appearing in the record will not be considered.

We find no prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 132 So. 64, 24 Ala. App. 156, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 306 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

132 So. 64 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkerson v. State
128 So. 777 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Hayes v. State
128 So. 776 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Hayes v. State
128 So. 774 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)