Alexander v. Rainey, County Treasurer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Alexander v. Rainey, County Treasurer

1911 OK 71, 114 P. 710, 28 Okla. 518, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 141

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 21, 1911·No. 1795·Published

Opinion

DUNN, J.

The above-entitled cause presents error from the district court of Hughes county.

The issues presented are identical in all respects with those of the case of Gleason v. Wood, ante, 114 Pac. 703, except as the same are applicable to the allottees of the Creek or Muskogee *519 Tribe of Indians, and the opinion of the court in that case is adopted and promulgated as the opinion in this one.

The judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the petition is accordingly affirmed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur; KANE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNN, J.

The above-entitled cause presents error from the district court of Hughes county.

The issues presented are identical in all respects with those of the case of Gleason v. Wood, ante, 114 Pac. 703, except as the same are applicable to the allottees of the Creek or Muskogee *519 Tribe of Indians, and the opinion of the court in that case is adopted and promulgated as the opinion in this one.

The judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the petition is accordingly affirmed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur; KANE, J., dissents.

Alexander v. Rainey, County Treasurer, 1911 OK 71, 114 P. 710, 28 Okla. 518, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 141 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK 71 (Alexander v. Rainey, County Treasurer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related