Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 14, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-10004·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Jeriel Alexander, DATE FILED: 4/14/2021 Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-10004 (JPO) (SDA) -against- ORDER Private Protective Services, Inc., Defendant.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: WHEREAS, on April 1, 2021, the U.S. Marshals Service filed a “USM-285” Process Receipt and Return form indicating that Defendant had been served with the Summons and Complaint in this action on March 11, 2021, via personal service on the New York Secretary of State, as statutory agent for service of process on a business corporation’ (ECF No. 27); WHEREAS, Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint expired on April 1, 2021;2 WHEREAS, on April 9, 2021, Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant (ECF No. 28); WHEREAS, no Clerk’s Certificate of Default against Defendant has been entered in this action;

1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(a); N.Y. C.P.L.R. 311; N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 306. * Although Defendant was served via a method provided for by New York State law, and under New York law a defendant has 30 days to respond to a complaint, see CPLR 3012(c), the applicable response time here remains the 21 days provided for by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Kondaur Cap. Corp. v. Cajuste, 849 F. Supp. 2d 363, 367 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (citing Beller & Keller v. Tyler, 120 F.3d 21, 25-26 (2d Cir. 1997)). In any event, the issue is moot, given that 30 days have now elapsed without any response from Defendant.

WHEREAS, a Clerk’s Certificate of Default against a defendant must be entered by the Clerk of Court before a plaintiff may move for default judgment against that defendant. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may renew such motion after the Clerk of Court has entered a Clerk’s Certificate of Default against Defendant. In order to enable to Clerk of Court to do so, Plaintiff must file a Proposed Clerk’s Certificate of Default and an Affidavit in support thereof, following the procedure set forth at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/clerks- certificate-default. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York April 14, 2021 List A. STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc. (Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beller & Keller v. Joseph Tyler, and Tyrone Kindor
120 F.3d 21 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Cajuste
849 F. Supp. 2d 363 (E.D. New York, 2012)