Alexander v. Prestridge
266 So. 2d 212, 262 La. 1067, 1972 La. LEXIS 4907
This text of 266 So. 2d 212 (Alexander v. Prestridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alexander v. Prestridge, 266 So. 2d 212, 262 La. 1067, 1972 La. LEXIS 4907 (La. 1972).
Opinion
Writ refused. Trial court reply that trial will be forthcoming immediately makes consideration now untimely on the writ of mandamus. No prejudice to relator to properly and timely raise further legal objections.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 So. 2d 212, 262 La. 1067, 1972 La. LEXIS 4907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-prestridge-la-1972.