Alexander v. Pitz

51 N.W. 851, 34 Neb. 361, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 127
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 30, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 51 N.W. 851 (Alexander v. Pitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Pitz, 51 N.W. 851, 34 Neb. 361, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 127 (Neb. 1892).

Opinion

Norval, J.

This action was brought by A. E. Alexander against Peter Pitz and C. J. Martin to foreclose a tax lien. From a decree in favor of plaintiff the defendants appeal.

Peter Pitz is the owner of the legal title to the real estate and the defendant Martin is the owner and holder of a mortgage upon said premises. The statute of limitations is pleaded as a defense.

Plaintiff’s grantor, S. N. Merriam, purchased the lands at tax sale on September 4, 1871, and the treasurer’s deed was issued on the 5th day of September, 1873, which failed to convey the title to the lands therein described by. reason of the failure of the treasurer to attach to the deed his official seal. The action was brought on the 13th day of September, 1888, or more than fifteen years after the date of the tax deed. Peter Pitz and his grantors have been in the actual, open, notorious, continuous, adverse, and exclusive possession and occupancy of said lands, as owner, for more than ten years prior to the commencement of the suit. The action is barred. The case falls within the decision in Black v. Leonard, 33 Neb., 745, and for the reasons given in opinion filed in that case the decree of the district court is reversed and the action

Dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Leonard
51 N.W. 126 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 N.W. 851, 34 Neb. 361, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-pitz-neb-1892.