Alexander v. Pease

543 A.2d 839, 1988 Me. LEXIS 227
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 13, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 543 A.2d 839 (Alexander v. Pease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Pease, 543 A.2d 839, 1988 Me. LEXIS 227 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Margaret Alexander appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Lincoln County) dismissing her petition, which she captioned as being in “Mandamus,” in which she sought a Superior Court order that the defendant, a District Court judge, recuse himself from her underlying action in the District Court. Because the judge’s decision not to recuse himself is a discretionary act and not a ministerial one, the judge’s decision is not an appropriate subject of review by mandamus, Ray v. Town of Camden, 533 A.2d 912, 913-14 (Me.1987), and therefore the Superior Court correctly dismissed Alexander’s petition.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. Town of Camden
533 A.2d 912 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 A.2d 839, 1988 Me. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-pease-me-1988.