Alexander v. Patten
1 D.C. 338
This text of 1 D.C. 338 (Alexander v. Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alexander v. Patten, 1 D.C. 338 (D.D.C. 1806).
Opinion
refused a continuance as a matter of right under the Act of Congress, which was admitted by all the bar to be in force in such a case, as it provides for a case different from that in the Virginia Act. The Court referred to the case of Codman v. Wilson, in the Supreme Court, where the point was decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-patten-dcd-1806.