Alexander v. Patten
1 F. Cas. 374, 1 Cranch 338
This text of 1 F. Cas. 374 (Alexander v. Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alexander v. Patten, 1 F. Cas. 374, 1 Cranch 338 (circtddc 1806).
Opinion
THE COURT refused a continuance as a matter of right under the act of congress, which was admitted by all the bar to be in force in such a case, as it provides for a case different from that in the Virginia act The court referred to the case of Codman v. Wilson, [Wilson v. Codman, 3 Cranch, (7 U. S.) 193,] in the supreme court where the point was decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 F. Cas. 374, 1 Cranch 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-patten-circtddc-1806.