Alexander v. Page

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Alexander v. Page

150 N.Y.S. 104

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.Y.S. 104 (Alexander v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. Page, 150 N.Y.S. 104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

COHALAN, J.

The action was brought to recover $100 alleged to be due the plaintiff by reason of the membership of a decedent in the defendant lodge. Death benefits are paid under the provision’s of the following by-law:

“One year’s membership and the payments for all dues, taxes, and fines having occurred against him, in the event of death, his widow or beneficiary may receive as a death benefit the sum of $100.”

The case was heard on the pleadings and the by-laws, as a matter of law, and no evidence was introduced except a copy of the defendants’ by-laws. The plaintiff sued as an administrator of the estate of the decedent. It appears that he was an uncle of the deceased member. As a matter of law, on the allegations of the pleadings and under the by-laws of the defendant lodge, we do not see how he is entitled to recover. The by-laws specifically state that no recovery may be had except by the widow or the beneficiary of a deceased member. Concededly, the plaintiff’s intestate neither left a widow nor named a beneficiary. The by-laws are a binding contract between the lodge and its members. Hellenberg v. Ind. Order of B’nai Berith, 94 N. Y. 580; Hess v. Johnson, 41 App. Div. 465, 58 N. Y. Supp. 983.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and judgment entered for the defendant on the pleadings, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COHALAN, J.

The action was brought to recover $100 alleged to be due the plaintiff by reason of the membership of a decedent in the defendant lodge. Death benefits are paid under the provision’s of the following by-law:

“One year’s membership and the payments for all dues, taxes, and fines having occurred against him, in the event of death, his widow or beneficiary may receive as a death benefit the sum of $100.”

The case was heard on the pleadings and the by-laws, as a matter of law, and no evidence was introduced except a copy of the defendants’ by-laws. The plaintiff sued as an administrator of the estate of the decedent. It appears that he was an uncle of the deceased member. As a matter of law, on the allegations of the pleadings and under the by-laws of the defendant lodge, we do not see how he is entitled to recover. The by-laws specifically state that no recovery may be had except by the widow or the beneficiary of a deceased member. Concededly, the plaintiff’s intestate neither left a widow nor named a beneficiary. The by-laws are a binding contract between the lodge and its members. Hellenberg v. Ind. Order of B’nai Berith, 94 N. Y. 580; Hess v. Johnson, 41 App. Div. 465, 58 N. Y. Supp. 983.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and judgment entered for the defendant on the pleadings, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.Y.S. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-page-nyappterm-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack