Alexander v. Odgis

272 A.D.2d 917

This text of 272 A.D.2d 917 (Alexander v. Odgis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Odgis, 272 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Defendants in two actions, one commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to recover damages for personal injuries, and the other commenced in the Municipal Court, Borough of Brooklyn, to recover for property damage, resulting from the same accident, appeal from an order denying their motion for a consolidation of the actions. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. In our opinion the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Rolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-odgis-nyappdiv-1947.