Alexander v. Ocpark Estates Corp.
This text of 251 A.D.2d 436 (Alexander v. Ocpark Estates Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated August 18, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There exist no triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the plaintiff’s injuries were proximately caused by the defendant’s negligence. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 436, 675 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-ocpark-estates-corp-nyappdiv-1998.