Alexander v. New York State Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alexander v. New York State Commission

283 A.D. 698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1954

DocketNo. 7649; No. 7650; No. 7651; No. 7652; No. 7653

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 698 (Alexander v. New York State Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. New York State Commission, 283 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

— ■ On the ground that item 3 of the subpoenas in question is, in each case, by its terms wholly unlimited as to time, the subpoenas (A) in Appeals Nos. 7649, 7650, 7651 and 7652 should be modified so as to provide that the list of securities or in the alternative the securities to be produced, should be limited to securities owned or acquired; directly or indirectly, by the person or corporation subpoenaed from January 1, 1946, to date; and the subpoenas (B) in Appeal No. 7653, the said item 3 in that subpoena should be similarly modified by inserting as the limited time from January 1, 1948, to date; as so modified the orders appealed from are unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle orders on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— ■ On the ground that item 3 of the subpoenas in question is, in each case, by its terms wholly unlimited as to time, the subpoenas (A) in Appeals Nos. 7649, 7650, 7651 and 7652 should be modified so as to provide that the list of securities or in the alternative the securities to be produced, should be limited to securities owned or acquired; directly or indirectly, by the person or corporation subpoenaed from January 1, 1946, to date; and the subpoenas (B) in Appeal No. 7653, the said item 3 in that subpoena should be similarly modified by inserting as the limited time from January 1, 1948, to date; as so modified the orders appealed from are unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle orders on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-new-york-state-commission-nyappdiv-1954.